jump to navigation

The All Powerful Cell Phone November 19, 2008

Posted by airyrae in Endangered Species?.
Tags: ,
add a comment

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic”
Arthur C. Clarke  
 

New media and its applications are revolutionizing the way we communicate and do business.  I was reading a blog this week about gadgets that were killed by the advent of the cell phone.  Some of the top items on the list were: pagers, alarm clocks, wrist watches, and cameras.  It’s also predicted that the next high tech gadget that will see its demise via the evolving cell phone is the laptop. 

 

Thinking about my incredible, inedible, cell phone – I can’t believe I even consider it a phone.  A phone by definition allows you to have a verbal conversation with another person.  But these days I’m doing less talking on my cell phone and more of everything else.  As such, I’ve created my own list of items that my cell phone has replaced in my life. 

 

Pen Memory.  Why waste my time with pen memory when I can just save the content to my cell phone.  If I misplace my pen drive it takes me twenty minutes to track it down the little sucker and I don’t have time to waste.  Saving copies on my cell phone, which is fully capable of handling Microsoft Office, is so much easier.  Who needs pen memory these days?

 

Camcorder.  I never even owned a camcorder and since my cell phone has this capability, I probably never will.

 

Address Books.  I think I still have one of these from back in the good old days….somewhere.  But address books are now a waste of my time since my cell phone alphabetizes entries for me, reminds me of birthdays and anniversaries, hot syncs with my computer.

 

Photo Albums.  I take pictures with my cell phone, and that’s where they sit.  I’m not a scrap-booking kind of girl, or even one that will put pictures in a photo album.  As such, my cell phone also takes care of this task for me.

 

Board Games.  Monopoly, Battleship, Solitaire, and your other favorite board game. Yes we own them but my husband and I just play these games together on our cell phones when we’re bored.  It so much easier to play on our cell phones than to get out the actual game. 

 

Voice Recorders.  Once again, why buy a separate gadget when most cell phones have this feature available.  Unless you need to record hours and hours and hours of content, or need a copy of the conversation for business records, your personal cell phone can easily accomplish this feat.

 

TV’s.  My digital cable went out at the beginning of the presidential debates and in the middle of a Packer’s game.  Was I mad? Of course, I was mad.  So I picked up my cell phone to call friends and vent, and realized that I could tune into live broadcasts via Sprint TV. Problem solved.  Who needs cable any how?

 

Not only have cell phones replaced all of these gadgets, along with many others, but also you can back up the content of your cell phone.  So if your cell is lost or broken, it’s not like you lost your photos, contacts, video or games.  The added security that cell phones bring to the gadgets it’s replacing is refreshing: making it easy for consumers to leave these once loved items in their past.  What other gadgets have been replaced by your cell phone?

Out With the Old? October 31, 2008

Posted by airyrae in Endangered Species?.
Tags: ,
add a comment

“If words were invented to conceal thought, newspapers are a great improvement of a bad invention”

                                             Unknown

 

In recent decades newspapers have been experiencing a decrease in readership.  And it is predicted that newspapers will eventually see their demise because of new media. And this trend is already becomming apparent with the Christian Science Monitor’s shift to an online only existance. The two primary causes of this downward trend among newspaper readers are decreasing circulation rates and the lack of trust the public has in this medium.  Neither of these situations was the sole cause for the decline in newspaper readership: rather it was the combination of the circumstances that these situations are compiled of that accounts for the decrease.  The primary factors that caused a decrease in the circulation of newspapers are the digital age, the inability of newspapers to attract young readers, and the federal do not call law.  Likewise, there were several items that contributed to public’s lack of trust in this medium.  Newspaper scandals along with coverage and staff cuts have led to a credibility gap, which in essence furthered the decrease in newspaper circulation and readership.

The digital age, which entails the rise of cable television news channels, the internet and cell phone alerts have all contributed to the loss of newspaper readers.  The core readers of many newspapers were urban consumers who have now moved into the suburbs making it more difficult for newspapers to be distributed on a daily basis.  Lifestyle and technological changes altered the news business.  The population shift away from urban to suburban America – and the problems that created for home delivery – helped erode the afternoon paper.  As such, cable television programming has been able to reach these consumers more readily and relevantly than newspapers.  The internet, along with e-mail, news websites, and to some newspaper’s own demise, the implementation of free online versions of newspapers, has caused consumers to feel hard copies of newspapers are unnecessary.  These sites might not hurt readership overall, but they can erode a newspaper’s paying audience. Furthermore, advancing technology has allowed consumers to have news updates sent directly to their cell phones.  The immediacy and convenience that the digital age has given consumers in receiving news updates has worn away at what used to be American’s primary source of news: the newspaper. 

When newspapers began to experience a decrease in readership due to increasing technology, many papers began to target more upscale white collar consumers.  However, it was primary the blue collar workers that consumed afternoon newspapers.  As such, many newspapers alienated a major portion of their daily audience and the children of these consumers never developed the newspaper habit.  That shift toward elite audiences dictated where the circulation declines occurred.  By and large, when the afternoon papers that appealed more to working class readers died, those readers stopped reading newspapers.  Since then, these children have matured into young professionals that newspapers are desperately trying to attract.  But despite most efforts, the younger generations are not apt read newspapers on a regular basis because they never learned the habit at home.  As the children of these lost readers become more affluent and influential, can it be assumed that they will just gravitate to a newspaper no matter what?  The average age of a newspaper consumer is over 51.  As these consumers retire, newspapers will eventually lose the vast majority of readers, which is why it is essential that new young readers are gained now.  Because a publisher can’t grow a business in the long-term if it’s not growing its audience.

Another aspect of decreasing circulation that has hindered the solicitation of consumers, both young and old, was the implementations of the federal do not call law.  While advertising revenues make up the vast majority of profits, a newspaper needs a healthy circulation rate to attract these advertisers.  As such, telemarketing was a crucial element in helping newspapers solicit consumers for renewals and new subscriptions.  When the federal do not call law was put into effect newspapers lost the ability to solicit many consumers and circulation rates further decreased. 

What further fueled this decrease in circulation and overall readership of newspapers was a widening credibility gap.  Many consumers see newspapers as one of the least credible sources of news coverage.  People think newspaper journalists are out of touch and unethical. In part, the credibility crisis is a disconnect over motive. Journalists think they are working in the public interest. The public thinks they sensationalize and report articles to make money.   Journalists are also viewed by the American public as more cynical than people in other professions.

 

While there are many factors that led the American public to this consensus, newspaper scandals and the trimming of staff and coverage fueled it.  This lack of professionalism and sensationalism was highly publicized in several scandals within the newspaper industry.  The most notable example is the scandal in 2003 at The New York Times, particularly the news that the reporter Jayson Blair had engaged in extensive fabrication.  To see such irresponsible reporting tactics in such a highly regarded newspaper furthered the gap between consumers and newspapers.  Furthermore, in light of decreasing readership, many companies have come under scrutiny for bulking up their circulation with discounted copies that didn’t attract high-quality readers along with overstating their circulation rates.  The collaboration of decreasing circulation, readership and scandals resulted in many newspapers being forced to downsize their staff and coverage.  While the budget cuts hit hardest in areas like training, travel and resources for investigative and in-depth reporting, the areas some deem most critical in providing quality news content, the loss of high quality journalist furthered the disconnect from readers.  Trimming staff and coverage undercut the print product itself, making it less appealing to consumers, and therefore, to advertisers.

The decline in circulation and public trust are issues that the newspaper industry has been battling for years and there is no simple solution to these situations. However, it is clear that focusing on profits and aging demographics certainly isn’t the solution.  The appeal of visual media, along with the increasing availability and convenience of television and online news versus print are all competitive advantages that will only get harder for newspapers to compete with.  As such, it is essential that newspapers not only focus on increasing their circulation to younger demographics but also on gaining credibility and relationships with potential consumers. 

Arin

My Ode to Books October 30, 2008

Posted by airyrae in Endangered Species?.
Tags: , ,
2 comments

“Never judge a book by its movie”

Unknown

 The Kindle is a wireless reading device that allows users to downloads, books, magazines, newspapers and blogs in a matter of minutes, regardless of their whereabouts.  The Kindle is said to be the future of book reading.  However, there is only one Kindle that I want to curl up with during a lazy afternoon: and that is the kindling in my fireplace: which is exactly where the Kindle would end up if I was ever given one. 

 

In my opinion, books are half the fun of reading. The crisp pages, the way the new books smell different from old books smell different from the books my grandpa gave me.  The ability to transcribe the book’s cover and pass your favorites on to friends and family through the generations.  The way you don’t need a battery, or a cord, or an outlet, or a prescription for eye drops to read books.  The way you don’t have to worry about getting cancer from snuggling up with a book for hours or days.  The way that if you accidentally spill coffee on a book it ends up just giving the book more character and doesn’t short out.  The way you could put a book in a time capsule and two hundred years down the road people could still read it with out compatibility issues.  The way that book covers are bound to books.  The way you never have to worry about your book having a low battery.  The way you have to go to a book store or at least a book section to buy a book.  The way libraries are full of books.  The way a wall-to-ceiling book shelf looks with books on it.  The way no two books are exactly alike. I believe that these are all good things. 

 

If it’s not obvious already, I’m not a big fan of this whole wireless reading device thing.  The entire concept just irritates me.  However, I will admit that I wasn’t always so opposed to this idea.   When I was getting my undergraduate degree I always thought that an application, like the Kindle, would be awesome to have in lieu of lugging a backpack full of text books around campus.  Students could just download their required text books onto their Kindle at the beginning of the semester, saving trees, reducing attendance costs, and saving their backs from years of chiropractic adjustments.  Students could also then easily search each text book to easily find the exact subject matter they’re looking for.  While I’m all for using Kindle’s technology to enhance my education: leave my books out of it. 

 

I think that this advancing technology upsets me so much because it threatens things that I have experiences with and formed emotional attachments to. 

Ultimately, I can see how the Kindle would be well-received by certain groups of people: namely students and avid readers who go through three books a day.  I definitely would consider a Kindle as a high school or college student if it allowed me to cost effectively download and search the textbooks I needed for class.  And I would reluctantly use a Kindle if the world’s tree supply was becoming endangered because of our paper demands.   However, paperless books only benefit the environment if they are being produced and powered in an environmentally-friendly way. 

 

 

I’m not trying to go all Fahrenheit 451 on you, but imagine a world without books.  What would be there to stop someone from limiting the content that is available for us to read via wireless reading devices.  It would be extremely easy for someone to regulate and even edit the literature if it was only available through new mediums.  This is a risk, I’m definitely not willing to take. 

 

-Arin